Research paper: Do human cognitive differences in information processing affect preference and performance of CAPTCHA? ( LINK )
- Which quantitative method or
methods are used in the paper? Which are the benefits and limitations of
using these methods?
This paper try to conduct a experimental research using computer collecting data aim to improve user experience in using
CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell
Computers and Humans Apart) in order to make it more user friendly as well as
preserve the security. Therefore , they conduct two user studies
1) explored the effect
of users’ cognitive styles (Verbal/Imager) on user preference and task
performance of two complementary types of CAPTCHA mechanisms; text-recognition
and image-recognition. [1]
2) explores the effect
of users’ cognitive processing abilities (speed of processing, controlled
attention, working memory capacity) on task performance in regards with
different levels of complexity [1]
The benefit of using quantitative is that they can gather a lot of data from many participants answering both of the two question they wanted to find out. For the sampling the first study has a total of 131
undergraduate Computer Science students participated (76 male, 55 female, age
20–25, mean 23) having recorded the same number of CAPTCHA sessions. The second
study has a total of 125 undergraduate Electrical Engineering students
participated (48 male, 77 female, age 18–28, mean 20). A total of 125 CAPTCHA
sessions have been recorded. [1]
For the evaluation, they consider data about the task
performed by the users. This includes the type of CAPTCHA (text or image), the
level of complexity (baseline or higher), the total time (in seconds) and total
number of attempts to successfully solve the CAPTCHA challenge. Based on the
total number of attempts, the success rate (in percentage) of each session was
also calculated. [1]
They reason why it is a good research finding using quantitative
method is that it consists of observing and explaining each steps,
collecting information, and analyzing the information
For the limitation, people cognition style could be
difficult to define since each of people has different background and
experiences. Therefore the result might be different in various different groups. more over, Since quantitation method is a collection of numbers they could overlook some of the factors each participant being test. Such as user eyesight , color-blind, speaking language, participants surroundings etc.
2. What did you learn about quantitative methods from reading the paper?
Each experimental study only focuses on
one topic. They use two user-study to answer two questions. One study for the
style test of the CAPTCHA, another one for the speed test. Their sampling group
have an appropriate number of users participating in the study. One group of
study, participants should have some similarity in their age, study background.
The whole group is mix with both male and female. Same number of the testing material
was put into each group therefore they can get a credible result.
- Which are the main methodological problems of the
study? How could the use of the quantitative method or methods have
been improved?
The validity result is the main concern. they concern that the experimental design must be under the real-life context in order to get an accurate result. they also concern whether the result can be generalise to a wider extent.
Another limitation was the diversity of participants because in this study they only have undergraduate student. The sampling group could expand to more
various background. They could have another study of people who are in working
class or people from other specialized area included.
The result numbers that their experiment had
collected need to be analyzed carefully because it is not only about
user-friendly but also security. The result would identify that one type of
CAPTCHA is more effective at the same time it have to also test not to be weak
for security.
reference: 1. Belk, M., Fidas, C., Germanakos, P., & Samaras, G. (n.d.). Do human cognitive differences in information processing affect preference and performance of CAPTCHA? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1-18.
---------------------------------------------
Read the following paper written by Ilias Bergström and colleagues. Reflect on the key points and what you learnt by reading the text. Also, briefly discuss the questions below.
Keypoint of this research is to find if the form of body in virtual reality effect the behaviour using the immersive virtual reality at the first person perspective of people playing drum with different type of skin color and clothes.
Quantitative data can help collect more data compare to qualitative which is better for generalize the result. More data can be collect with more number of people per session. Instructions can be provide within the method material which make it easier for the researcher.For limitation, quantitative can overlook other contextual factors surrounding the participants by just collecting numeric result; missing something that cannot obtain by numbers or tick box. The interpretation maybe more difficult because you have to turn numbers into understanding.
Qualitative data is an in-dept analysis that researcher will have a close observation of the participants when they answering questions. Research an ask participants additional questions. Or participants can ask researcher to clarify when they don’t understands the process. For limitation, qualitative can be time consuming and more expensive than quantitative. The researcher has to be with the participants in each step of procedure. Research can conduct with less number of participants compare to quantitative which can be difficult to have a generalize result.
Keypoint of this research is to find if the form of body in virtual reality effect the behaviour using the immersive virtual reality at the first person perspective of people playing drum with different type of skin color and clothes.
1. Which are the benefits and limitations of using quantitative methods?
Quantitative data can help collect more data compare to qualitative which is better for generalize the result. More data can be collect with more number of people per session. Instructions can be provide within the method material which make it easier for the researcher.For limitation, quantitative can overlook other contextual factors surrounding the participants by just collecting numeric result; missing something that cannot obtain by numbers or tick box. The interpretation maybe more difficult because you have to turn numbers into understanding.
2. Which are the benefits and limitations of using qualitative methods?
Qualitative data is an in-dept analysis that researcher will have a close observation of the participants when they answering questions. Research an ask participants additional questions. Or participants can ask researcher to clarify when they don’t understands the process. For limitation, qualitative can be time consuming and more expensive than quantitative. The researcher has to be with the participants in each step of procedure. Research can conduct with less number of participants compare to quantitative which can be difficult to have a generalize result.
I think that you well pointed out the two main benefit and limitation of quantitative methods. On one hand, the really huge amount of data and on the other hand, the fact that this huge amount covers maybe too many people and thus, it is more difficult to draw relevant conclusions about different specific groups. Maybe, it would be more relevant to do it in the other way round, I mean, beginning with a specific population, drawing remarks and seeing if we can generalize them to other populations. Don’t you agree?
ReplyDelete